Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:42:06 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Willy Picard <picard@kti.ae.poznan.pl> Subject: Re: net/skype, linux_base-fc6 and the missing linux-alsa-lib... Message-ID: <20080429104206.966715vjspapthls@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <06495214@ipt.ru> References: <20080428204301.GB78357@copernic.kti.ae.poznan.pl> <06495214@ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:14:25 +0400)= : > Well, there is a PR about the case: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/122826 > You may use a patch from this PR. > > But I'm not sure if it will be committed (I'm not speaking about f8 I don't think it will hurt if the fix for fc6 is committed. There are =20 users out there which already use the experimental 2.6.16 support, and =20 it would make their life easier. > case). The thing is that linux_base-fc{5,6} and linux_base-f7 were > ports to test FreeBSD with sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=3D2.6.16 > and let the kernel development improve. Now the kernel development > is close to switch to osrelease=3D2.6.16 by default at CURRENT. And > only linux_base-f8 (or later) may become a default at CURRENT and > later releases. > > Note: almost all linuxolator changes where merged from 8-CURRENT to > 7-STABLE. But I'm not sure if the default compat.linux.osrelease is > ever changed to 7.x. That's a good question. I before we get some data how the transition =20 from 2.4 to 2.6 in -current works out or the users, we can not give an =20 answer. Bye, Alexander. --=20 Hope not, lest ye be disappointed. =09=09-- M. Horner http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080429104206.966715vjspapthls>