From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org  Sat Jul  8 10:43:44 2017
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782AFD96D9A;
 Sat,  8 Jul 2017 10:43:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rezny@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 575067C421;
 Sat,  8 Jul 2017 10:43:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rezny@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1406)
 id 95BA3150A; Sat,  8 Jul 2017 10:43:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: Matthew Rezny <rezny@freebsd.org>
To: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>
Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r444827 - head/graphics/mesa-dri
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 12:43:19 +0200
Message-ID: <3938240.aoVo4vHdRa@workstation.reztek>
Organization: FreeBSD
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.1-BETA2; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <201707011439.v61EdRL9051873@repo.freebsd.org>
References: <201707011439.v61EdRL9051873@repo.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 10:43:44 -0000

On Saturday 01 July 2017 14:39:27 Jan Beich wrote:
> Author: jbeich
> Date: Sat Jul  1 14:39:27 2017
> New Revision: 444827
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/444827
> 
> Log:
>   graphics/mesa-{libs,dri}: update to 17.1.4
> 
>  
> Changes:	https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-announce/2017-June/000
> 337.html
> Changes:	https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-announce/2017-June/000
> 339.html MFH:		2017Q2
> 
> Modified:
>   head/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common   (contents, props changed)
>   head/graphics/mesa-dri/distinfo   (contents, props changed)
> 
> Modified: head/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common
> ============================================================================
> == --- head/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common	Sat Jul  1 14:36:20
> 2017	(r444826) +++ head/graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common	Sat Jul  1
> 14:39:27 2017	(r444827) @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>  MESAVERSION=	${MESABASEVERSION}${MESASUBVERSION:C/^(.)/.\1/}
>  MESADISTVERSION=${MESABASEVERSION}${MESASUBVERSION:C/^(.)/-\1/}
> 
> -MESABASEVERSION=	17.1.2
> +MESABASEVERSION=	17.1.4
>  # if there is a subversion, don't include the '-' between 7.11-rc2.
>  MESASUBVERSION=
> 
> 
> Modified: head/graphics/mesa-dri/distinfo
> ============================================================================
> == --- head/graphics/mesa-dri/distinfo	Sat Jul  1 14:36:20 2017	
(r444826)
> +++ head/graphics/mesa-dri/distinfo	Sat Jul  1 14:39:27 2017	(r444827) 
@@
> -1,3 +1,3 @@
> -TIMESTAMP = 1496724371
> -SHA256 (mesa-17.1.2.tar.xz) =
> 0937804f43746339b1f9540d8f9c8b4a1bb3d3eec0e4020eac283b8799798239 -SIZE
> (mesa-17.1.2.tar.xz) = 9837516
> +TIMESTAMP = 1498843561
> +SHA256 (mesa-17.1.4.tar.xz) =
> 06f3b0e6a28f0d20b7f3391cf67fe89ae98ecd0a686cd545da76557b6cec9cad +SIZE
> (mesa-17.1.4.tar.xz) = 9899196

Please explain why you have made this unauthorized non-maintainer commit with 
no PR and no review.  As there is no PR or review, I can only assume this was 
untested until released in field while I was dutifully testing this exact 
update. I dropped my testing when it was made pointless. While the content of 
this change was correct, the process taken was wholly incorrect.