From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 21:04:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8268761; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02D4228D; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72FE61FE027; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 23:04:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53D6BB0B.4010604@selasky.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 23:05:15 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: svn commit: r269127 - head/sys/dev/usb/wlan References: <201407261606.s6QG61le092895@svn.freebsd.org> <53D3FDEC.5040000@selasky.org> <53D55CD9.4000408@selasky.org> <53D6B784.6080102@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "src-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:05:00 -0000 On 07/28/14 22:52, Adrian Chadd wrote: > The whole rate control thing from net80211 has to be upgraded. Drivers > shouldn't be using ni->ni_txrate for anything other than informational > purposes, yet .. well, that's not the case. Hi, Should the rate be extracted from the NET80211 header instead, and if yes, how? --HPS