Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:59:31 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup tags for architectures? Message-ID: <18198.55843.652865.770391@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20071018034119.GA54778@hub.freebsd.org> References: <4716D2B7.9040300@isc.org> <20071018034119.GA54778@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:41:19 +0000, Mark Linimon <linimon@hub.freebsd.org> said: > If you look at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsuploadstatus.py, you'll > see a survey of what packages the ftp*.freebsd.org sites are currently > storing. (NB: ftp1.freebsd.org and ftp12.freebsd.org arbitrarily limit > the number of results returned, which confuses my algorithm). "green" > means "has the same stuff as ftp4" (I had to choose one site as canonical). > (This survey doesn't count the 'release' packages.) FWIW, I will be putting a new disk in ftp5 prior to 7.0/6.3's release date and hope to be carrying the full bits once I've done so. (We have the disks; I just haven't had time to move the archive over.) I don't think we should be marked as bad, however, if we have bits more recent than ftp4 does! -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18198.55843.652865.770391>