Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 06:46:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Cc: jobaldwi@vt.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: revisiting Motif policy in ports Message-ID: <199904271346.GAA85213@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <199904270940.CAA23892@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> from Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami at "Apr 27, 1999 02:40:29 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> * From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
>
> * No. If you don't have HAVE_MOTIF in /etc/make.conf, then you get:
> *
> * cd /usr/ports/editors/nedit
> * make install
> * nedit-5.0.2 requires motif.
> *
> * I think the last line should at least be changed to advertise
> * the availability of LessTif.
> *
> * cd /usr/ports/editors/nedit
> * make install
> * nedit-5.0.2 requires motif. LessTif is a LGPL implementation
> * of the Motif API. A port is available in ports/x11-toolkits/lesstif.
> * See /etc/make.conf.
>
> I think this is a good idea. Is this wording OK for everyone? (I'll
> substitute "${PORTSDIR}/" for the "ports/" part above.)
>
It's okay with me :-)
--
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904271346.GAA85213>