From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 28 1:51:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AF137B402 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 01:51:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g1S9pOZR058098; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:21:25 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: Re: Pentium and NO_F00F_HACK = kernel panic From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Johann Frisch Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020228092726.2B33037B402@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20020227213355.EAAC837B405@hub.freebsd.org> <200202280123.RAA79623@star-one.liberator.dyndns.org> <20020228092726.2B33037B402@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 28 Feb 2002 21:21:24 +1130 Message-Id: <1014889885.13562.16.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 20:57, Johann Frisch wrote: > > "F00F hack" works around the CPU bug; the NO_F00F_HACK option > > disables the workaround.) > > I knew that and I have no problem using this option. I am just curious > if this kernel behaviour is intented or not? No, it shouldn't panic. You should have it on as it wouldn't save you very much space.. Could you get a stack trace (enable crash dumps etc..) and file a PR about it? :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message