From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 3 23:57:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [209.192.237.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C65A14CC7 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 23:57:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 110gD6-0001oY-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 04 Jul 1999 02:57:08 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 02:57:07 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PNIC problems: duplex contradiction & dropped packets Message-ID: <19990704025707.B2631@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <3.0.3.32.19990704021204.00728fb0@mail.embt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19990704021204.00728fb0@mail.embt.com>; from Tom Embt on Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:12:04AM -0400 X-fish: < Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tom Embt probably said: > I am running a Kingston KNE110TX (82c169) card under FreeBSD 3.2-BETA > connected to an Asante 8+2 switch. I have been having two (almost > certainly related) problems: I'm using BSD boxes (2.2.8-R and 3.2-S) with intel pro100b net cards and an Asante 8+2 switch. They negotiate full duplex fine, but I can't get them to do 100bT even if I force both ends ... Not much help, but a datapoint. I _do_ like the pro100b cards, thats the only problem I've had with them they usually Just Work. P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@shore.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message