From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jan 1 9:33:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8083C14C24 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:33:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05524; Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:33:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA45198; Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:33:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:33:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001011733.JAA45198@vashon.polstra.com> To: karl@Denninger.Net Subject: Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-) In-Reply-To: <19991231225535.A8004@Denninger.Net> References: <19991231225535.A8004@Denninger.Net> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <19991231225535.A8004@Denninger.Net>, Karl Denninger wrote: > > What does (someone) need to do to get this changed out/updated? I can't > send it in as a port, since its part of the base package (setting > it up as a port would be pretty trivial from what I can see) There already _is_ a port of it (net/ntp). And there are hooks in /etc/rc.conf ("xntpd_program") to use the ports version instead of the one in the base system. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message