From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 07:33:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4285637B401 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 07:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CFE43F3F for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4UEXr29006081 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 30 May 2003 10:33:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id h4UEXmt37435; Fri, 30 May 2003 10:33:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16087.27596.771233.714068@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 10:33:48 -0400 (EDT) To: Luigi Rizzo In-Reply-To: <20030530072605.A97702@xorpc.icir.org> References: <16087.23499.422415.378026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030530133052.GC414@nitro.dk> <16087.24004.208831.221102@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030530072605.A97702@xorpc.icir.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting connections per IP w/FreeBSD ftpd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:33:55 -0000 Luigi Rizzo writes: > On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:33:56AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > ... > > As for adding it to the server itself, its an alpha, and I don't think > > dummnet/ipfw are production quality on alpha... > > actually the ipfw1/dummynet code is the same and should be working > perfectly fine on the alpha. ipfw2 does have alignement issues on > the alpha and sparc, but i have patches (posted to the -alpha and > -sparc64 lists almost 2 weeks ago now) which are just awaiting some > good soul with those platform to provide feedback. Ah, thanks. I'd confused the 2 in my mind; sorry. I thought Wilko (wkb) had a test setup for ipfw2? Drew