From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 1 20:25:42 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA12037 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 20:25:42 -0800 Received: from hemi.com (hemi.com [204.132.158.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA12026 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 20:25:36 -0800 Received: (from mbarkah@localhost) by hemi.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA02418; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 21:29:40 -0700 From: Ade Barkah Message-Id: <199511020429.VAA02418@hemi.com> Subject: Re: FreeBsd 2.0.5 installation with Windows 95 To: amengual@sadeya.cesca.es (Carlos Amengual) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 21:29:40 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Carlos Amengual" at Nov 1, 95 09:58:32 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 771 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Independently of this problem with the boot manager, do Win95 partitions > allow to be mounted as dos filesystems under FreeBSD ? It looks like > not, as its FAT is the new VFAT, and knowing it for sure would help me > to decide whether to install it on my home PC or not. I've mounted my Win95 partition under FreeBSD 2.0.5 and it seems to work (very light use only so far, I try not to use MSDOSFS.) I solved the booting mess easily since I happen to also have OS/2 Warp installed on my machine. The OS/2 boot manager makes everyone happy. =) -Ade Barkah -------------------------------------------------------------------- Inet: mbarkah@hemi.com - HEMISPHERE ONLINE - www: --------------------------------------------------------------------