From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 17:38:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6638B37B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:38:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1D1c1W33930; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:38:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200102130138.f1D1c1W33930@harmony.village.org> To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:32:39 PST." <20010212173239.O3274@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010212173239.O3274@fw.wintelcom.net> <200102130127.f1D1RKU56334@mobile.wemm.org> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:38:01 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010212173239.O3274@fw.wintelcom.net> Alfred Perlstein writes: : Er, why isn't /tmp/install.XXX done with static binaries? Because the binaries are host binaries and we have no control over whether they are static or dynmaic. At best we could do is to copy libraries over as well. But I think the major bumps ala Dag's 501 would be better. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message