From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 27 8:30:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.plutotech.com (panzer.plutotech.com [206.168.67.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C521815661 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 08:30:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ken@panzer.plutotech.com) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.plutotech.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) id JAA63243; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 09:30:41 -0600 (MDT) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" Message-Id: <199904271530.JAA63243@panzer.plutotech.com> Subject: Re: Is pci0.16.0 a valid PCI location? In-Reply-To: <37255D21.ED7A3F6E@cs.strath.ac.uk> from Roger Hardiman at "Apr 27, 1999 7:45:53 am" To: roger@cs.strath.ac.uk (Roger Hardiman) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 09:30:41 -0600 (MDT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Roger Hardiman wrote... > Hi. > Someone on -multimedia reported kernel panics when they enabled the > bt848 driver. > > a) Does anyone know of any brain damaged Micron 440 LX motherboards. > > b) I noticed this in their boot log > > > bktr0: rev 0x11 int a irq 11 on pci0.16.0 > > Is PCI location 16 valid? I have never seen anything go higher than > pci0.12.0 before. Yes, that's a valid bus/device/function. The device/slot numbers can go up to 31. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message