From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 13:00:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914AFB00C3D for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2061529 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p188so80615846lfd.0 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:00:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a51ki1x4y1uuBBHxyuE7S051/k1Xf5HpOW7x2+uoLOk=; b=vioRT8EXl+7YepgpAssaKUIE4vgwgTT1TA/2kJnTCT2CLS5hMo8reYPjYXepoFMvJp UR7blrniB9aImA71wHmXzjiIU807mqkHGpnaUfTZWFEy/jLh6aiWm5WCTb/DbP6Dvuk4 R2C5WSzp47UooRXyCBv0so06+TXEqra74oRe0od2BvbRFn04sFB4Ods4L7fqpsHdrM5H M4HZHwvGW/H3AOHFjcUdVj4H3mpo9Wm2ZSCsVP7bR6BAjNGe9PzOiWXj+5/FMLpcueTC 4m7vRpSPu2I+2Uk+I01MdwHnPUbWg5cjfq+4MzaWFXPi06WF6WtSiC/e7HEHN/ky0RBB JgyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a51ki1x4y1uuBBHxyuE7S051/k1Xf5HpOW7x2+uoLOk=; b=gy2qRW5B7c9TiHFOqS10H5KWTpsmQQdXJW9g2b4L7TsjCzZAGColzojsl5ieeELDfy eziNMyNNXPNPY63IiryDNd9L7tsbfBWiXZK3JiEYUUp89BJ/yB3kWhpWGroNvvg9mI5M ye6bGIMEmbsgW7DEs97zS8pZXOnZYcODAV3vuky1DAPi48aw23yKaGdZrSNCIIe4NmKE xO1zP0EFjj3mCI/iAY7uh2USkPyiechtoE3z9qC8mNjx5byftNFyer5EEMS9LiEtUxM8 XStxP69kp870nT0k13TjuEhaNFbNFrovB7gNbtl8qzds7EZ5ECvg4t55iR0vEYYJUEBk DRbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIeXhUhqKjqgjnWH4WdkJeTB0HRs2tlj/yPvjaDGozKrmSlZ8By2wtWcsx0pewkMA== X-Received: by 10.194.71.226 with SMTP id y2mr10145497wju.127.1459602050379; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id js8sm18762644wjc.37.2016.04.02.06.00.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 15:00:47 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Michael Grimm Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4 Message-ID: <20160402130047.GN1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <6DD156C6-C3E1-43BC-8EC5-1ACB16EBFC3E@ellael.org> <20160402124845.GM1128@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <05DDCF70-8865-4F1F-A264-3000B8EF5244@ellael.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 13:00:52 -0000 --Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >=20 > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >=20 > >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: > [=E2=80=A6] > >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and p= kg-1.7.0: > [=E2=80=A6] > >> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and https://svnweb.f= reebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=3Dlog are not indicating that be= havior. > >> But I might have missed something. > >>=20 > >> Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards, > >=20 > > pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain. >=20 > Ok, understood. >=20 > JFTR: perl (24s), python27 (44s), and ruby (125s) take the longest time t= o reinstall. >=20 > > I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8 >=20 > Good to know, thanks for your feedback. >=20 Thank you very very much for yours! very much appreciated, it helps improvi= ng things! Best regards, Bapt --Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW/8J/AAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aICcP/RDwP6FDOd/zp+3TtOBCOM36 wY8fvFDrhMxGoWckfy5qlPHdqMqw+3Mh/MNCMsk06dEbBX+Myz1enDopXlTl9ys4 rWmDpLVHrikTWPcmIcRZ8exxfYRcH+LwlOmSb53D4B6jc3xPgbj6MGQ7JSNvPeAI M3rAl7o1OgK2TkP7sOaJ5Ux3/m2mnga6LeRHGiIUu2GLOtGYoMIkx6sb2yCbVeiW zxjUBaay1tVWXqvjuVnzDiycmoxrgFt2Ax2WymvlqJ7E8mLJzzGEuDN4oVfzfwEd ihkFB2SCu5lQmkYvi3f29vMm4TpPGRWc4VFxL2DwtHeF4qfwd5bnsczLx9jWFM1P uagfv+fiNX2zWFxeNEF6uiHRstcYk269UblrFJaH7Wg6f4ht2yEfi7Cfry5/MpWs 3PKUwnrwnVy71vMxd7RYTwJEFnMwvkGb6HQPOqnEcnwsjP7uLkHHWKyXsGf4zWi3 sMolpljtwjLUU9sfLxXBiSbWKls2FgNBt3imDmkYglUYzakx7nuIe4bWOtMhgl8p CqQ8sSekNYAPWmQ12HBWlIFBpOOk38hjsC/L0IN7Pb89ENyQ4bnIXZkEc5LT002U 2hp/Y19h9CkPvcCZbJQsLUOEatqQNbaWZeh8bAyShYT1YcPIflLh9fwps6i4tdK7 GMq91ju05IX8Y+yWpTpX =H1Jt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zl+NncWK+U5aSfTo--