From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 04:10:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAEF16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:10:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52709.mail.yahoo.com (web52709.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97F7B43D2F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kamalpr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 3200 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Mar 2005 04:10:42 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=mc/kopIJsaiH0UZwTl1t+UG2bYi4VM6/KFvNNbkMcW0ZgyYRS35/AZfAqp8O2yJYejzS5/FyHuFLqLmc+ZEeEQqshLY3VVwURDnjDVmf9v9EIWem1doQSVmWgeG6pGuCq771J8y9pt2nSJyxqR8KDLXFSfaVtaFniNM6vRNpbRQ= ; Message-ID: <20050303041042.3198.qmail@web52709.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.91.78.244] by web52709.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:10:42 PST Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:10:42 -0800 (PST) From: "Kamal R. Prasad" To: Julian Elischer , kamalp@acm.org In-Reply-To: <42261D95.9020506@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Lucas Holt Subject: Re: sched_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kamalp@acm.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:10:43 -0000 --- Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Kamal R. Prasad wrote: > > >--- Lucas Holt wrote: > > > > > > > >>Wouldn't a multi threaded program potentially need > >>more cpu time than > >>vi? > >> > >> > > > >No. That is not a given. > > > > > > > >>Multithreaded apps are created to do a lot of > >>computation or > >>because they have a lot of concurrent activity > that > >>might block right? > >> > >> > >> > >Threads are meant to take advantage of concurrency. > > >Maybe the freebsd implementation should implement > NPTL > >in entirety. > > > > > NPTL? > New Pthreads Library from Library? Yes. > isn't that GPL'd? > No -it is a standard. The linux implementation of nptl is gpl'ed. regards -kamal ===== ------------------------------------------------------------ Kamal R. Prasad UNIX systems consultant kamalp@acm.org In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is:-). ------------------------------------------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com