From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 18 13:14:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA13922 for current-outgoing; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:14:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA13917 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA00586; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT) To: Warner Losh cc: Jonathan Lemon , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: various 'fetch' errors In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Jul 1996 14:04:24 MDT." <199607182004.OAA02779@rover.village.org> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:13:42 -0700 Message-ID: <584.837720822@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Yes. You are being naive. :-) Let's say I wanted to fetch 10-20 > things. And I have microbandwidth to the rest of the world. I want > them to happen sequentially rather than in parallel. Let's also say I > have multiple users that want to do this (say 1-2 each and there are 5 One of the nice things about UNIX is that you can string existing tools together. Putting all of the above into fetch strikes me as overkill in the extreme and you'll never see me add anything as ludicrous as this to it! :-) Jordna