From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Sep 26 13:52:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA09109 for chat-outgoing; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hod (hod.tera.com [206.215.142.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA09091 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from athena.tera.com (athena.tera.com [206.215.142.62]) by hod (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA26134; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:52:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Kline Received: (from kline@localhost) by athena.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA19879; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199609262052.NAA19879@athena.tera.com> Subject: Re: support for 16650 In-Reply-To: from Scott Blachowicz at "Sep 26, 96 12:48:36 pm" To: scott@statsci.com Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Cc: kline@tera.com, jonny@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL23 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Scott Blachowicz: > Gary Kline wrote: > > > I'm guessing that 38.4 is likely. 56Kpbs would be like > > having an ISDN line. Interesting times, huh? > > Boy...between that and some other stuff floating around (ADSL? cable modems?), > it sounds like ISDN is going to be a dinosaur pretty soon? (Hey sonny! I can > remember when you had to order a special kind of phone line just to get > 128K...and saying "Wow! 9600 over a normal phone line! Look out world!") > Really. The catch is that unless the mega-telcos invest zillions in additional fiberoptic lines, all of the Joe Sixpacks who log on looking for >whatever<, it won't help to have anything faster than 14.4. There's something to be said for the good old days of maybe last year (!!) when we had the net largely to ourselves.... gary PS: Last week a commentator on NPR complained that most of the techhie/nerds/geeks wanted to keep the Internet for themselves. I thought: Yeah...so what's your point? *mumble*