From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 04:31:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057A437B401 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 04:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from razor.kraksystem.pl (razor.kraksystem.pl [217.97.202.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3746443F85 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 04:31:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ftyczka@ftyczka.org) Received: from h1-11.krak ([192.168.1.11] helo=192.168.1.11) by razor.kraksystem.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19KGD4-0002bq-00 for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 May 2003 13:32:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 13:32:04 +0200 From: ftyczka X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62q) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1378432161.20030526133204@ftyczka.org> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: different approach in FreeBSD advocacy X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ftyczka List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 11:31:45 -0000 Hello, Has anybody thought that maybe due to the recent Linux lawsuit by SCO, it would be possible to take advantage of this situation, and promote FreeBSD, as the one system that doesn't risk getting into any legal problems?