Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:09:59 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gettext Makefile Message-ID: <20040712080959.GA42480@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040712080310.GA49631@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200407120516.i6C5GThX001618@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040712054253.GB33305@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040712062800.GA37188@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040712063346.GA36974@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040712072558.GA38505@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040712073015.GL46056@voodoo.oberon.net> <20040712080310.GA49631@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 01:03:10AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:30:15AM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > > OPTIONS are in pre-beta stage right now. I don't like it also, > > but AFAIK eik@ is working at replacement of it. > =20 > I'll say they are still 1/2 baked. >=20 > What's the method for exposing various build options to 'pkg_add -r' > users? It is less useful if there isn't a mechanism for choice to those > users. For important options you make a slave port. For trivial options, which you say these are, that would be a waste of inodes. > P.S. What is the rule for how obtuse an option can be and still be > OPTIONS'ed? As obtuse as you like, it's *optional*. Kris --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA8kdXWry0BWjoQKURAhD+AKCj2dxQA9UWIGSP3GgeD/JO1BNGbwCg4ZvL SfqDKjexvejHgAWj2RprAgA= =MS/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040712080959.GA42480>