Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:49:34 -0700 From: Gary D Kline <kline@thought.org> To: "E. J. Cerejo" <ej.cerejo@laposte.net> Cc: OpenOffice Mailing List <openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: is this portupgrade command close? Message-ID: <20030418184934.GB4977@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <3EA042AC.9070305@laposte.net> References: <20030418180758.GA4820@tao.thought.org> <3EA042AC.9070305@laposte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:23:40PM -0400, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > > > # portupgrade -bP openoffice-1.0.3 > > If you want to keep a backup of the older files and build a package > after install then it is the command but it won't upgrade the > dependencies. If dependencies need to be upgraded also you might end up > with different versions of dependencies. > Since I'm not interested in keeping a backup or build a package I always > use this: > > # portupgrade -R port_name > > The -R makes sure it builds my out of date dependencies also > Since I have the newer 1.0.3 src I could just rebuild here. That may be the more rational approch if I were to do a src upgrade. Shouldn't the dependencies be correctly configured in the package tarball? gary PS: thx for your oreillynet pointer in your next post. > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030418184934.GB4977>