From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 13:48:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 693ECE6F; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:48:26 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: svn commit: r307766 - head/sysutils/salt Message-ID: <20121126134826.GB62928@FreeBSD.org> References: <201211260604.qAQ649wY012225@svn.freebsd.org> <20121126061719.GC24378@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:48:26 -0000 On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:12:25PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> -WWW: http://saltstack.org > >> +WWW: http://saltstack.org > > > > Actually, it should be terminated with a slash as well. > > Why? http RFCs have clarified for more than a decade that the > presence or absence of a slash does not make a difference here. Purely aesthetics reasons (and consistency with most of the other ports descriptions). ./danfe