Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 May 2007 18:41:22 +0200
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: msleep() on recursivly locked mutexes
Message-ID:  <4638BF32.5040607@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <46323A77.8010907@elischer.org>
References:  <200704262136.33196.hselasky@c2i.net> <200704270748.49404.hselasky@c2i.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0704270906001.8536@sea.ntplx.net> <200704271917.29939.hselasky@freebsd.org> <46323A77.8010907@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> 
>> First of all: Where is FreeBSD's locking strategy document? 
> It is just started.. man 9 locking.  it needs a lot of work still.

I'm working with rwatson@ about a document that can nicely fit in 
locking(9), but we are a little bit stuck in terminology.
In order to not confuse even more locking consumers we are trying to 
find right and unique terms for kernel events linked to locks.


Attilio



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4638BF32.5040607>