From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 10 18:16:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA04830 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA04818 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id SAA18815; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606110116.SAA18815@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Jason Thorpe cc: Ted Lemon , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Swapped ethertype in BPF output? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:41:00 PDT." <199606110041.RAA19384@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:16:41 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >On Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:35:06 -0700 > Ted Lemon wrote: > > > Sigh. Yeah! Things have been crazy! > >Tell me about it.. :-) > > > > It's not just the ethertype, from what I can tell...See the following > > > kludge in NetBSD's rbootd(8) (the HP Remote Maintainance Protocol boot > > > server): > > > > That doesn't make sense. There isn't any length in the ethernet > > header! > >Eek, and now that I look at it, the HP RMP length field is in the same >place as ethertype ... So, rather than the "more than one place" (been a >long day), why don't we say "there's precedence for kludging around the >bug"... :-) ehh, uhh, well, send me a context diff for however people want it in the kernel. :-) -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project