From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Dec  4 01:40:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA07031
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 01:40:34 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA07026
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 01:40:32 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA14643; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 01:40:17 -0800 (PST)
To: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com>
cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), jak@cetlink.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 3.0 -release ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Dec 1997 22:09:55 CST."
             <199712040409.WAA16845@home.dragondata.com> 
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 01:40:17 -0800
Message-ID: <14639.881228417@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> No, but consider someone who hasn't made up their mind yet, and knows
> little/none about the current OS'es out there. The point I'm trying to make
> is that it would, in my mind, help things considerably if there was in
> interim (beta, maybe?) release of 3.0, with the warning that it's not done.

How is that any different than a snapshot?  We even offer them on CD.

					Jordan