From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 28 06:23:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA27207 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 28 May 1996 06:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra.Sarnoff.COM (terra.sarnoff.com [130.33.11.203]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA27196 for ; Tue, 28 May 1996 06:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from rminnich@localhost) by terra.Sarnoff.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA13242; Tue, 28 May 1996 09:22:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 09:22:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ron G. Minnich" X-Sender: rminnich@terra To: Jake Hamby cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, Fred Condo , Adam Leff Subject: Re: Mac Linux: Nothing to worry about :-) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I was very disappointed with the DR1 release of MkLinux for PowerMac. I said it before and i'll say it again: MkLinux is a very popular OS (linux) running as a "server" on an OS no one cares about or likes (Mach) from a company that is rapidly becoming irrelevant (Apple). The Mach and Apple pieces are trying to ride the popularity of Linux. I think they're going to fail. You shouldn't be surprised if it's slow. OS servers on Mach have always been slow and probably always will be. Or, as someone working on such a server once said to me: Performance: it sucks Reliability: it sucks This is a guy who gets *paid* to do Mach. > The question is: Would it be best to build a BSD "personality" No, no, a thousand times no, unless you want to give BSD a bad name. Scrap Mach. Use the pmap code etc. but don't waste your time on that kernel. ron