Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:49:43 +1000 From: "Doug Young" <dyoung6@bigpond.net.au> To: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>, "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Gerry Freymann" <freymann@eagle.ca>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: PPPoE causes a Kernel Panic Message-ID: <001001c0ca59$296a0d10$b88e093d@oracle> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104202033110.91829-100000@marlo.eagle.ca> <001301c0c9fd$47740ab0$328e093d@oracle> <20010420221800.A7521@xor.obsecurity.org> <00a001c0ca24$f7354230$328e093d@oracle> <20010421010603.A9128@xor.obsecurity.org> <006201c0ca56$79b46e80$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> How is this wrong? I've been running a firewall machine with PPPoE for some time configured this way. 'options NETGRAPH' needs to be present, but any component of netgraph that isn't statically linked in the kernel will be loaded dynamically from the set of modules in /modules. > As I stated in an earlier message, the non-inclusion of the additional lines results in error messages when pppoe starts. If the handbook specified that ALL the lines should be included then there wouldn't be a problem. I've sent in a PR ?? re the issue. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001001c0ca59$296a0d10$b88e093d>