From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 7 8: 6:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231F737C755 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:06:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e67F6ic14848; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:06:44 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Marius Bendiksen Cc: Bill Fumerola , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alterations to vops Message-ID: <20000707080644.H25571@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000706160120.Z25571@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from mbendiks@eunet.no on Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 02:58:32PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Marius Bendiksen [000707 05:58] wrote: > > The disks are busy and vi most likely is doing an IO request, either > > implement a per-process buffer high water mark or deal with it. :) > > This could be done by an IO scheduler. I think it's AIX that has a tuneable per-process limit on outstanding IO. It would be an interesting thing to implement. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message