From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 3 12:27: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E1615531 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 12:27:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA147102; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 15:25:21 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199911031917.MAA10150@mt.sri.com> References: <199911031844.LAA09963@mt.sri.com> <199911031857.KAA06668@dingo.cdrom.com> <199911031917.MAA10150@mt.sri.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 15:26:43 -0500 To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), Mike Smith From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: GENERIC build broken Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), current@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:17 PM -0700 11/3/99, Nate Williams wrote: > > BOOTP in > > the kernel will go _when_there_is_an_acceptable_alternative_. > >You've already stated *THERE IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE*, and it's >PXE. (I can use all caps instead of underscores to make a point too :) I thought he was saying that "bootp in the kernel" should be removed at some point in the future. Not "all bootp" support, but just "inside-the-kernel hacks for bootp". I say let's cross the "remove bootp in the kernel" bridge when we actually come to it. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message