From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 30 11:51:47 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949A337B401
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net (gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000C743F75
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:51:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gritton@iserver.com)
Received: from guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net (guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.55])
	by gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D513BF292
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:51:45 -0700 (MST)
Received: from guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net by guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:51:45 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from gritton@localhost)
	by guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h0UJpjI8027789;
	Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:51:45 -0700 (MST)
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: What's the memory footprint of a set of processes?
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0301291145030.25856-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <x7k7gnog4m.fsf@guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net> <20030130064448.GA7258@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <200301300719.h0U7JOfI086054@apollo.backplane.com> <x7znpi60hd.fsf@guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net> <200301301941.h0UJfa0e089230@apollo.backplane.com>
From: James Gritton <gritton@iserver.com>
Date: 30 Jan 2003 12:51:45 -0700
In-Reply-To: Matthew Dillon's message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:41:36 -0800 (PST)"
Message-ID: <x7wukm5sby.fsf@guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> writes:

>     Then you simply group all the processes which share VM
>     objects together and report statistics on a group-by-group basis
>     rather then on a process-by-process basis.  You won't know what an
>     individual process uses but you know exactly what the group of
>     processes use in aggregate.

   Yes, that sounds good.  I've got a jail-like setup, so the process groups
I'm interested in should be nearly identical to those sharing objects.  I
don't need to know individual process usage, so this seems to be just what
I'm looking for.
   Now on to some actual coding :-).

- Jamie

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message