Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 21:47:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working Message-ID: <bug-280390-7501-jCGEq35FAp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280390-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-280390-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280390 --- Comment #20 from Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #19) An example of my comment #19 is a bad example. There is no problem with the communication of the created dynamic rules. However, if a packet that passes through that dynamic rule has to pass thro= ugh a packet of another protocol (e.g. icmpv6 packet too big message), there is= no path for the translation that would allow it to pass. Therefore, such settings should not be made. NPTV6 instances can be identified by name and used separately, but they see= m to be usable only under conditions where multiple upstreams switch due to failover. Since my upper stream is already /64, there is no room to divide it into multiple lines. I have to think of another way to separate the upstream while keeping the prefix length that allows temporary address auto-configuration downstream..= . :) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280390-7501-jCGEq35FAp>