From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 21:46:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0B2374A1F; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3RSr2NZbz3ypP; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1594417594; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dKaalwwnME669o9pMloa0G5/Vcig4+6H75vevphod5g=; b=O9eyWf8ImfCDPvz+L8Mwt3pT2lNMAndc+dZcIuoQ6LMPxCnU63cyjRgneJG13EhtuJM83e 3JqDNDGT/OmtmA0QtEC2jysgciZgq5EQiRGzRFrlRIEoBXER67EMqA4Pvf1hQX+esVUz4J zdmV3TNQrc0TZ12VGyJvsj4KUPYMvDU= Received: from amy.home (lfbn-idf2-1-686-145.w86-247.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.247.139.145]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c04d7f5f (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:46:34 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Yuri Pankov Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DRM Project report (week of July 6th) Message-Id: <20200710234634.a49d8e98a53c4a2feb593fb1@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <67f9a36c-2eec-4128-79c8-9bf4c98c3617@yuripv.dev> References: <20200710232845.5461736e8d2cb198763d7442@bidouilliste.com> <67f9a36c-2eec-4128-79c8-9bf4c98c3617@yuripv.dev> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4B3RSr2NZbz3ypP X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bidouilliste.com header.s=mx header.b=O9eyWf8I; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bidouilliste.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manu@bidouilliste.com designates 212.83.155.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=manu@bidouilliste.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.39 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bidouilliste.com:s=mx]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.022]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bidouilliste.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bidouilliste.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.85)[-0.851]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.012]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:37 -0000 On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:41:53 +0300 Yuri Pankov wrote: > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > [...] > > Hi Emmanuel, > > Sorry for somewhat hijacking the thread, but as you mentioned (IIRC) > testing the vmwgfx in one of the previous mails, I'd like to ask if any > work/fixes is done for that. Currently I don't have a VM with X11 > installed as all my attempts didn't succeed -- it's either a hard hang, > panic, or VM dying with exception, even with a workaround of 1 CPU > (core) provided in the Wiki. I can reinstall and provide panic info if > you are interested in looking into it. Hi, I haven't tested vmwgfx or vboxvideo yet, iirc someone told me that at least vboxvideo used to work, I have no idea if vmwgfx used to. If you have any panic please open an issue there : https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/ To be honest with you intel and amd are my priorities and already occupy most of my time for testing. The plan that I have is to be sure to have for vboxvideo and vmwgfx when I reach 5.4 -- Emmanuel Vadot