Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Oct 1995 18:21:37 +0300 (MSK)
From:      =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su>
To:        asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu, Stefan Esser <se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Netscape 2.0beta1
Message-ID:  <gl1-eUmWjY@ache.dialup.demos.ru>
In-Reply-To: <199510100936.AA11170@Sysiphos>; from Stefan Esser at Tue, 10 Oct 1995 10:36:55 %2B0100
References:  <199510100936.AA11170@Sysiphos>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199510100936.AA11170@Sysiphos> Stefan Esser writes:

>On Oct 10,  1:03, Satoshi Asami wrote:
>} Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1
>} (Sorry for crosspost -- replies to ports only)
>} 
>} Well, so what do you guys think about updating the "port"?  (I know,
>} it's a binary-only port and we can't distribute the distfile/package
>} anyway....)  I've been using it since yesterday, and it feels really
>} "beta", so I won't update the port unless people really want the
>} change to go in.

I dislike this idea, it contains too many bugs for everyday usage
comparing to old version.
BTW, I think separate port (netscape2) will be nice addition.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov        : And I rest so composedly,  /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su       : That any beholder  /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3    : Might start at beholding me,  /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team :         E.A.Poe         From "For Annie" 1849



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gl1-eUmWjY>