From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 10 0:10:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D9637B423; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 00:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA03107; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 00:10:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 00:10:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: RSA liberated In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000910014320.00c00cc0@207.227.119.2> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > At 08:01 PM 9/9/00 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > > > > > On a related note, is there some way to check and/or verify > > > whether we're using "native" OpenSSL vs RSAREF, for > > > example, afer a {build,install}world? > > > >If you have /usr/lib/librsaINTL.so you are using native, it you only have > >librsaUSA then you're using rsaref. > > Is there a reason why both are built and installed. > Imagine there is some cleanup to be done for the RSA stuff. Yes. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message