From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 18:40:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB36510656C3 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA368FC21 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so5892394qyk.13 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:date:to:cc :subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Qhf6LhCnZe6BRqba+LytY/61crmgmrAK8ECGiNoxn/E=; b=rAcHp0PcwFzLU/F158QDvUpOLBtlnyQYe7R2WUr81LpkMgPB5Kt9VNWcTdqp4G2+Mi tdxvpyuGJ1L/T5EbBUILYEYggqhiwIdPWxXrpKtRLT0VmUPoweBVsh5fiHbXgoSNinn9 JKfAxkD4GRdjxFzDM6to3JxIlfyRu4I1jjsuM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Gf0wtlS+tm8YGI57XeSt1x6dtdLg1ED4/J8HGNPbXH5wyx8ooFJgZCx9LY28bGM8Yh WshGfyW8e/7/agS8+pmA2QYKcuTlKsjSIgzcRURbvyfolOtoGGoA3tz1Z7pKQSYSL+Px yGZWxeIQgD/ovb1uiOC8F2iceLB5DNBv/y2rw= Received: by 10.229.228.195 with SMTP id jf3mr5123559qcb.14.1283884849299; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l13sm7346452qck.7.2010.09.07.11.40.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:40:28 -0700 From: Pyun YongHyeon Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:40:28 -0700 To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20100907184028.GF1439@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <20100902100014.GA26562@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20100902170316.GA28362@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20100902183603.GD21940@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100903084204.GA35820@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20100903182534.GM21940@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100906130437.GA46535@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100906130437.GA46535@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bge(4) problem on sparc64 between r204991M and r212097 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:40:50 -0000 On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:25:34AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:36:03AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 06:03:16PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:00:14AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > > > I just updated world and kernel from r204991M to r212097 on sparc64. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now I can't ping my gateway. If I boot kernel.old, then > > > > > > the network works fine. As far as I could see mergemaster > > > > > > didn't update any network files. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please advise > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime I'll try intermediate revisions. > > > > > > > > > > I narrowed down the problem to between r212050 and r212080. > > > > > Will continue tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting. There was a big change in r212061, so try > > > > backing out that revision and see whether this makes differences > > > > or not. > > > > > > yes, r212061 is the offending revision, r212060 works fine. > > > Please let me know if you want any further information. > > > > Thanks for narrowing down guilty revision. Would you show me > > verbose boot message? > > First here's diff between dmesg outputs from r212060 and r212061: > [...] > This is full dmesg from r212060, below that is r212061. > [...] Thanks. It seems there was a bug in r212061. I committed fix for that in r212302. Would you give it try and let me know how it goes on your box?