From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 8:16: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B8037B401 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g47FFlf60653; Wed, 8 May 2002 00:15:48 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: References: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 11 From: Makoto Matsushita To: juha@saarinen.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 00:15:46 +0900 Message-Id: <20020508001546A.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG juha> Which existing features are you thinking of? I could be wrong, juha> but my impression is that BIND 9 adds several features over BIND juha> 8, not the other way round. named(8)/rndc(8) doesn't support UNIX domain socket for controlling named's behavior, host-statistics and other statistics file is not supported, etc. Try grep(1) source code with CFG_CLAUSEFLAG_NOTIMP. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message