From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 28 16:26:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172FB16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:26:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BAF43D4C
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:26:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2SGQUV6034231;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:26:32 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Scott <scottl@samsco.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:01:58 PDT."
             <42481C66.7090409@samsco.org> 
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:26:30 +0200
Message-ID: <34230.1112027190@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
cc: vova@fbsd.ru
cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
cc: ticso@cicely.de
Subject: Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it
	possible ? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:26:36 -0000

In message <42481C66.7090409@samsco.org>, Scott writes:

>So are you saying that an async notification mechanism needs to be
>invented for SCSI, or that all SCSI users should be required to use
>SES or SAFTE enclosures for all SCSI devices, or that we should be like
>Windows and constantly poll the devices?

I don't care _how_ we make CAM/SCSI behave like the users expect.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.