From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 12 23:31:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD93FAC7 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@h2.funkthat.com) Received: from h2.funkthat.com (gate2.funkthat.com [208.87.223.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88277DB4 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2.funkthat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h2.funkthat.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0CNVl5M082083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:31:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@h2.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by h2.funkthat.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id r0CNVlsT082082 for freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:31:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:31:47 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: how long to keep support for gcc on x86? Message-ID: <20130112233147.GK1410@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 54BA 873B 6515 3F10 9E88 9322 9CB1 8F74 6D3F A396 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? can i haz chizburger? X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (h2.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:31:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:31:48 -0000 So, now that -current x86 is defaulting to clang, how much longer do we need to support gcc on platforms that default to clang? I'm asking because clang support AES-NI, but gcc does not... So, can I commit clang only x86 code to the kernel now? And not provide support for gcc? -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."