From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 1 12:41:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rizzo.jerky.net (rizzo.jerky.net [204.57.55.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7741337B41B for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotpop.com (burton.hotpop.com [204.57.55.31]) by rizzo.jerky.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3775930FFF for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AFI (135.eagle.speede.com [64.39.177.135]) by zagnut.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 16FD350015 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:40:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dillion Klein" To: Subject: OS Vulnerability Statistics Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:40:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-HotPOP: ----------------------------------------------- Sent By HotPOP.com FREE Email Get your FREE POP email at www.HotPOP.com ----------------------------------------------- Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, I was directed to a very interesting list of stats on OS vulnerabilities, and was interested in any comments on FreeBSD's massive drop in vulns' from 2000 to 2001. Just by chance, or were there massive changes in the way the code was written, etc.? According to the stats, Windows NT/2000 is more secure than Linux... Link: http://securityfocus.com/vulns/stats.shtml Regards, --D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message