From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 11 12:57:02 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC771065670
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487D98FC17
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1KHIBI-000C4N-Kb
	for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:57:00 +0300
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:57:00 +0300
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1KHIBI-000C4N-Kb@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc: 
Subject: AuthenticAMD, cpufreq and SunFire X2200
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:57:02 -0000

Hi,
	I'm trying to find out why there is no frequency info.
ie:
sunfire> sysctl dev.cpu.0
dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU
dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu
dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR_.P001
dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0
dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0
dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/0
dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1
dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 100.00%

so any help/insight is most welcome.

BTW, its 7.0-stable

danny