From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Apr 20 21:24: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3092637B712 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:24:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04995; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:23:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000420222254.03fb2b50@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:23:53 -0600 To: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber), freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Best NIC / Best CDR-CDRW In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000420214146.041b3160@localhost> References: <8do7o6$2ui1$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> <38FCAC4B.1B007400@uwi.tt> <4.1.20000418231403.022c19f0@mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 09:46 PM 4/20/2000 , I mistyped: >These days, Netgear's 10/100 Mbps switches are really cheap. And they're >really fast; some even have the ability to use cut-through switching >when the LAN is clear. There's no reason to get them instead of hubs. I meant, of course, to say that there's no reason NOT to get them instead of hubs. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message