From owner-freebsd-performance@freebsd.org  Tue Mar  7 07:10:21 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B66CFB408
 for <freebsd-performance@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  7 Mar 2017 07:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538781505
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Mar 2017 07:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1cl9GE-000ORn-VF; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:10:18 +0300
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:10:18 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux
Message-ID: <20170307071018.GP15630@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:10:21 -0000

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:14:44AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:

> There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of 
> Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections.
> FreeBSD is the worst in this test.
> 
> https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html
> 
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png
> 
> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf

Is this you test?
I mean some congestion in file/page access layer on FreeBSD, can you
re-test w/ about 1000 different files?
I.e. every client request

http://server/X_K.bin~1
http://server/X_K.bin~2
....
http://server/X_K.bin~1000

not just http://server/X_K.bin