From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 11 16:43:18 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39651106566B;
	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA2A8FC12;
	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:Content-Type;
	bh=raDu7sGxK5+yDTOB8D29qh7XSXdXNRZHOaIEdqv0IMc=; 
	b=XuiON+Fqzl7rxaLGXeFb/8W8ui4uh0x/9Cs9cWGOT6i7yKXr/5HGOZRDd2lEyyxqn4VGfi3iUcmrmQm0srrNMnXsEjc4icllaMZL0MLuPOKiyPedWk3pSeT7CXUXUiMk;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
	id 1TBTYF-000Ax3-58; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:43:06 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1347381777-70338-70337/5/4; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:42:57
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com>,
	Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net>
References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
	<20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org>
	<20120911122122.GJ37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20120911123833.GA54483@freebsd.org>
	<848C813E-E6EC-4FAF-9374-B5583A077404@cederstrand.dk>
	<20120911133215.GB87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<CAMVU60ZVmCaYr=MyLsnz9tqD9O5m9Y8bgYiqtqvUXcYcXj-RmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<504F4650.9090700@protected-networks.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:42:53 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wkhcpr0n34t2sn@me-pc>
In-Reply-To: <504F4650.9090700@protected-networks.net>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Win32)
X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:43:18 -0000

On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:10:24 -0500, Michael Butler  
<imb@protected-networks.net> wrote:

> - From the link (http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp)
> that Steve Kargl referenced (dated July 2012).


I don't know where this guy is getting his info, but CLANG is /more/  
standards compliant and doesn't have an issue producing "correct" code.  
Though it might not be the fastest (yet).

And if Apple (probably one of the largest commercial CLANG users) doesn't  
have an issue with it producing "incorrect" code why should we believe  
this guy?