Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:13:29 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r448270 - branches/2017Q3/devel/git Message-ID: <1503090809.2638339.1078004064.204EA724@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <3c210e9f-145e-a434-6fb3-eb4bf8814c06@passap.ru> References: <201708182012.v7IKCDAU008546@repo.freebsd.org> <3c210e9f-145e-a434-6fb3-eb4bf8814c06@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, at 15:29, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 18.08.2017 23:12, Mark Felder =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > -DISTVERSION=3D 2.14.1 > > +DISTVERSION=3D 2.13.2 >=20 > PORTEPOCH bump? >=20 > Unfortunately you can't do a PORTEPOCH bump in a quarterly branch unless you do it in HEAD as well or it will break upgrades in the future. This was intentionally reverted without a PORTREVISION bump due to the following factors: 1) The 2.14.x update to git breaks devel/git-cinnabar as reported by jbeich@. It should not have been merged to quarterly but there was a miscommunication. 2) Quarterly branches are 99% of the time (fake but plausible statistic I made up) consumed as packages only 3) This package has not yet hit our mirrors. Last package set build was on 448018 I expect nobody to notice. This is not a wise gamble, but PORTEPOCH is a painful scar and I'm hoping we can avoid it. If we get reports this has actually affected someone I don't think we have a choice but to do a PORTEPOCH. --=20 Mark Felder ports-secteam & portmgr member feld@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1503090809.2638339.1078004064.204EA724>