From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Dec  6 00:31:42 1996
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA06947
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 00:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id AAA06941
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 00:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.3/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id IAA03707; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 08:30:40 GMT
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 17:30:40 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAXLOGNAME in struct eproc 
In-Reply-To: <199612060756.XAA02388@root.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.961206172956.3682A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, David Greenman wrote:

> >`struct eproc' has 4 "spare" bytes following e_login[MAXLOGNAME].  I
> >think this should have been removed when MAXLOGNAME was increased by 4.
> 
>    Actaully it's 4 spare longs. I just told Jordan to decrease it to 3.

FWIW, that's what BSDI did.

Mike Hancock