Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 20:27:01 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> To: "Dan Mahoney (Ports)" <freebsd@gushi.org> Cc: Daniel Engberg <diizzy@freebsd.org>, Freebsd Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection Message-ID: <51D669ED-DF32-4EAE-B2CA-C3C14C0B9C29@grem.de> In-Reply-To: <F4530345-CC43-4DDA-889A-734DE97C3932@gushi.org> References: <F4530345-CC43-4DDA-889A-734DE97C3932@gushi.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 7. Nov 2021, at 20:06, Dan Mahoney (Ports) <freebsd@gushi.org> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHi, >=20 > This caused me some headscratching (wait, is my port here but not in the l= ist? Am I mailed because a port here is a dependency of my port?) >=20 > I=E2=80=99ve concluded that instead I=E2=80=99m receiving this mail becaus= e you sent it to the entire ports mailing list. Am I wrong? At least one of the affected ports is maintained by ports@ (=3Dunmaintained)= . -m >=20 >> On Nov 7, 2021, at 7:04 AM, Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> You're receiving this mail because you have one or more ports that are af= fected by the change proposed in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32880 . >> What it means is that listed ports will be removed after 2022-03-31 unles= s you as a maintainer disagree and can provide reasonable argument why your p= ort(s) shouldn't be removed. >> The regular timeout for maintainer feedback (2 weeks) will apply as liste= d in Porter's Handbook however if you can reply please do as soon as possibl= e. >>=20 >> I would also like to thank you for maintaining ports on the FreeBSD ports= tree. >>=20 >> Best regards, >> Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51D669ED-DF32-4EAE-B2CA-C3C14C0B9C29>