From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 10:13:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BDE990AC1 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7846F2551 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t61ADPdE001275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:13:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t61ADOjZ001272 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:13:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:13:24 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Is I340-T4 capable of monitor mode on stable/10 r284296? Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:13:33 -0000 Hi, Does anyone know if Intel Ethernet Server Adapter I340-T4, quad ports, 82580 controller, can be used in monitor mode on stable/10 r284296? Will this work by itself: ifconfig igb1 up monitor promisc I don't get any error messages, so I assume the driver and adapter is on terms with each other. I'm having difficulty getting net-mgmt/iftop to see the traffic on the igb1, whereas tcpdump -vvs 0 -i igb1 sees the traffic. iftop has no problems seeing the traffic on bce1 on the same system. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 14:13:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689BD991345 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com (mail-ie0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3572B14 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by iecuq6 with SMTP id uq6so35482046iec.2 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:13:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=KhlndhWgUMmDckHt+zohEJvVH8pImRZbbN6EGFXwK0o=; b=DCigFDY3H5dEJ1jFiie2V3vJCTWCprQ+VkMa4T2eHPNtwt3ypfTpuYRSNDGisO5ind xGve3m9jQcrTmjpf8P+yebALKkx89us6CE3zn/Jv7uqe1Xo/blJUv8KwI964iANc6/BV kQi+Ug2Qjanks8jkXRuxXPGsz9T+/Q6XIei+oGQ3ZuCsYo99eKlyxbAvKbKz7JcLIift /qnmKhEkB5ALH2Muw7bR15d63uNA83L71iIvNC2t090Jd3omih4Sa6VnAx77fZVdw6ED Z5nxgYcKwm2q0cLatI3KEpt4nwZOdLkRyefKeLTwpaE2ObfyoxAR6Rr6H2+t//HLJTCC 0iZA== X-Received: by 10.50.87.74 with SMTP id v10mr5300761igz.37.1435759994178; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (184-100-80-212.mpls.qwest.net. [184.100.80.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kl8sm1716001igb.15.2015.07.01.07.13.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:13:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Clarification on simple, incremental ZFS backup Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:13:11 -0500 Message-ID: <861tgsaruw.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:13:21 -0000 Hey, folks. So a month or so ago I installed a shiny new root-on-ZFS system on my laptop. For some time I've been keeping incremental backups on an external USB drive using sysutils/rsnapshot, a front-end to rsync, but I've been interested in implementing the same sort of functionality using ZFS snapshots. I've read the relevant sections of the Handbook and looked around the web a bit, and the typical procedure recommended is that I simply replicate the filesystem: `zfs send -R @ | zfs receive ` There's a problem with this, though: when the filesystem is replicated all its properties are retained (naturally), including mountpoints. So the backup gets mounted over my local filesystem, making both useless. There's no way that I can see to unmount the backup filesystem (as that's now mounted to '/'), and importing the filesystem again after a reboot just mounts it over the local filesystem again. What am I doing wrong, here? Can anyone point me in the right direction? Does anyone here have a similar rsync-like backup scheme? -- ================================================================= :: Brandon Wandersee :: :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: ================================================================== 'A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.' - Douglas Adams ==================================================================