From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 15:07:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847CC1065670 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f71.google.com (mail-gx0-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9878FC1C for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so1730042gxk.11 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:07:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.89.18 with SMTP id m18mr1244890agb.1.1227539276697; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:07:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <001636164ad18911ba045c70c238@google.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:07:56 +0000 From: af300wsm@gmail.com To: Michael Johnson , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Re: Installing gimp from ports, need a GTK+, what port is it X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:07:57 -0000 On Nov 23, 2008 8:38pm, Michael Johnson wrote: > > > > The version of gtk you have installed is too old. Upgrade to the latest version of x11-toolkits/gtk2 > > Michael > > Interesting that the new google home page "plug-in (I guess)" for google mail doesn't have a reply-to-all button for the second response, and presumably further, to the original mail. So, I'm responding to both. Thank you Michael, that's exactly what I was looking for. I didn't know that x11-toolkits/gtk2 is synonymous with GTK+. That was the piece I was missing. To RW, I didn't want to rebuild KDE yet so that's why I hadn't updated all of the installed ports collection as yet. I think I agree with you. At least, with what I'm going through right now, it would be much easier to have updated the entire tree first. Thanks again to both. Andy