From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 15:05:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E030537B41A; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E052243FA3; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:05:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from tiger (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5IM4wUp076476; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:04:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <001e01c335e6$1ccca630$0701a8c0@tiger> From: "David Xu" To: "Daniel Eischen" , "Terry Lambert" References: Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:08:09 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 cc: threads@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Removal of bogus gethostbyaddr_r() X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Xu List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:05:20 -0000 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Daniel Eischen" To: "Terry Lambert" Cc: ; "Kris Kennaway" Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:17 AM Subject: Re: Removal of bogus gethostbyaddr_r() > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: >=20 > > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Any objections? > > >=20 > > > Why is this bogus? Do we have another gethostbyaddr_r hiding > > > somewhere? > >=20 > > It lies? (_r). >=20 > If that's true, then it's a bug and eventually should > be fixed. Additionally, you can't go around removing > public interfaces without bumping library versions > (unless said interface hasn't seen a release yet). >=20 I think those *_r interfaces are not very useful except bloating library. why do not improve non _r version to use thread local instead to make them reentrant between threads ? > --=20 > Dan Eischen >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >