From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 06:52:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E727216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 06:52:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs2.bgnett.no (vs02.bgnett.no [194.54.96.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E0043D39 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 06:52:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no ([194.54.107.19]) by vs2.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j316qG5b069949 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 08:52:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <810a540e05033109303d0d2ba4@mail.gmail.com> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 08:50:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <810a540e05033109303d0d2ba4@mail.gmail.com> (Pat Maddox's message of "Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:53 -0700") Message-ID: <8664z79ejp.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:52:25 -0000 Pat Maddox writes: > FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5. I'm not sure how to check the pf version. One possible source of trouble is running pf from ports on 5.3-release or newer. That could happen if you were running, say, 5.2.something with the port, upgraded your system to 5.3 but left the port in place. > I just started getting this error a couple days ago, and I've got > absolutely no clue why. I don't recall making any significant changes > to the box. That probably takes care of the incompatible port theory, then. Strange. The error message looks like the network interface has not been properly configured. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"