From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 14 11:24:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA48516A4CE
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DAC43FAF
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:24:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id hAEJOm1G005968;
	Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:24:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:24:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
In-Reply-To: <3FB4A988.15769.9BCCC68@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10311141424050.5061-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:24:49 -0000

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Dan Langille wrote:

> Daniel:  It appears the patch which was comitted didn't include 
> everything it should.  I blame myself because the patch below 
> contains both debugging code and is reversed.   I will submit a PR 
> with a patch.  In brief, what is missing is:
> 
> +                               if (n == 0) {
> +                                       break;
> +                               }
> +
> 
> Oops.

Please send me another email when you are done
testing it and want it committed.

-- 
Dan Eischen