From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 22 08:15:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69371933; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD208FC14; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (MN-VPN2.HS-Karlsruhe.DE [193.196.117.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 962F67E89D; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:05:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5084FE61.7030805@bsdforen.de> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:05:53 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121013 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florian Smeets Subject: Re: [CFT] fusefs-ntfs and fusefs-libs updates References: <5040DB95.30700@smeets.im> In-Reply-To: <5040DB95.30700@smeets.im> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , bdrewery@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:15:53 -0000 On my RELENG_9 system apart from ntfs non of the fusefs systems works any more: fusefs-smbnetfs-0.5.3a fusefs-sshfs-2.4 fusefs-wdfs-1.4.2_4 And concerning ntfs, ports/170695 is still present. All in all, I was much better off before the updates. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?